The stack

One stack, known deeply, rather than five known shallowly. Any engineer here can pick up any project, and we can be specific about tradeoffs instead of hedging.

Technology groups

Backend

ASP.NET Core.NET 8Entity Framework CoreREST APIsHangfireSignalR

Frontend

ReactTypeScriptRazor / MVCTailwind CSSVite

Data

SQL ServerPostgreSQLRedisAzure Blob Storage

Infrastructure

AzureIISWindows ServerGitHub ActionsDocker

AI

LLM integrationsOCR pipelinesSemantic search / RAGVector stores

Integration

OAuth 2.0OpenID ConnectWebhooksSFTPThird-party APIs

Why we standardized

Agencies that list thirty technologies are describing the union of everyone's CVs, not a capability. We picked .NET and React because they suit the systems we build — long-lived business applications that need to still be maintainable in five years, by someone who is not us.

The practical effect is that estimates are more accurate, code review is meaningful because everyone reads the same idioms, and when something breaks at 2am the person on call has seen it before.

Where a project genuinely needs something else — PostgreSQL over SQL Server, a Python service for a specific model — we use it and say why. But the default is boring on purpose.

What this means for you

Hiring is easier

A .NET and React codebase is one the market can staff. You are not locked to a framework only we understand.

Upgrades are routine

We stay on supported versions. No project inherits a runtime that went end-of-life two years ago.

Patches land fast

Microsoft and the React ecosystem ship them. We apply them within the support window, not when someone notices.

Running on this stack already?

Modernization and integration work starts with a code review, not a proposal.

Discuss requirements